Mina and Natively are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and GroqFully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by defaultOn-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Natively
+ Free and open source with active development
+ Can run entirely offline and store data locally for privacy
- Cloud models require user-supplied API keys and incur external usage costs
FAQ
Is Mina or Natively better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Natively compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Natively?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.