Mina and Minutes are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Mina
Minutes
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.