Mina and meetXcc are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. meetXcc: Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and meetXcc when google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | meetXcc |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Bot-free, invisible capture inside Google Meet |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Real-time transcription across many languages |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Mind map generation from meeting content |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | One-click export, email, and cloud storage sync |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
meetXcc
Choose meetXcc if you need google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant — strengths include invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call.
Mina
meetXcc
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while meetXcc is strong for google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.