Mina and ibisScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. ibisScribe: Japanese browser-based AI meeting minutes tool from Ibis Inc. that transcribes, identifies speakers, and auto-generates summaries without installing an app or adding a bot. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and ibisScribe when japanese businesses needing compliant, browser-only meeting minutes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Japanese browser-based AI meeting minutes tool from Ibis Inc. that transcribes, identifies speakers, and auto-generates summaries without installing an app or adding a bot.
AI-generated summaries with adjustable summarization promptsAutomatic speaker identification linking statements to speakersBrowser-based transcription with no app install and no meeting bot required
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ibisScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Browser-based transcription with no app install and no meeting bot required
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Real-time AI speech recognition for in-person and web meetings
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Automatic speaker identification linking statements to speakers
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
AI-generated summaries with adjustable summarization prompts
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Word-format export of completed minutes
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Customizable terminology dictionary and multi-language translation
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
ibisScribe
Choose ibisScribe if you need japanese businesses needing compliant, browser-only meeting minutes — strengths include no bot or installation needed, which simplifies setup and privacy review.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
ibisScribe
+ No bot or installation needed, which simplifies setup and privacy review
+ Operated by an ISO/IEC 27001 and Privacy Mark certified company
- Primarily oriented to the Japanese market and Japanese-language workflows
FAQ
Is Mina or ibisScribe better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while ibisScribe is strong for japanese businesses needing compliant, browser-only meeting minutes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and ibisScribe compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and ibisScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and ibisScribe?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.