Mili and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mili: Agentic AI platform for wealth advisors with recording-free meeting notes that sync directly into the CRM. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mili when capturing recording-free notes from in-person and virtual client meetings matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Agentic AI platform for wealth advisors with recording-free meeting notes that sync directly into the CRM.
Additional agents for scheduling, onboarding, prospecting, and complianceAutomatic summaries, follow-ups, and instant CRM updatesCRM sync with platforms such as Wealthbox
Mili is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Recording-free, real-time meeting notes via secure streaming
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Support for in-person, virtual, and phone meetings without joining as a bot
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Automatic summaries, follow-ups, and instant CRM updates
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Custom note and action-item formats for advisory workflows
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
CRM sync with platforms such as Wealthbox
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Additional agents for scheduling, onboarding, prospecting, and compliance
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Mili
Choose Mili if you need capturing recording-free notes from in-person and virtual client meetings — strengths include recording-free capture appeals to privacy-conscious advisory firms.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Mili
+ Recording-free capture appeals to privacy-conscious advisory firms
+ Works across in-person, virtual, and phone meetings without a meeting bot
- Built for wealth advisors, so less applicable outside financial services
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Mili or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mili is strong for capturing recording-free notes from in-person and virtual client meetings, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mili and Tana compare on price?
Mili is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mili and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.