Mili and OpenTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mili: Agentic AI platform for wealth advisors with recording-free meeting notes that sync directly into the CRM. OpenTranscribe: Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mili when capturing recording-free notes from in-person and virtual client meetings matters most, and OpenTranscribe when teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Agentic AI platform for wealth advisors with recording-free meeting notes that sync directly into the CRM.
Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration.
Mili is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mili | OpenTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Recording-free, real-time meeting notes via secure streaming | WhisperX transcription with large-v3-turbo and 100+ language support |
| Standout feature | Support for in-person, virtual, and phone meetings without joining as a bot | Automatic speaker diarization via PyAnnote v4 with overlap detection |
| Team usage | Automatic summaries, follow-ups, and instant CRM updates | Full-text search and filtering powered by OpenSearch |
| Integrations | Custom note and action-item formats for advisory workflows | AI summarization, topic extraction, and content analysis via multiple LLM providers |
| Languages & capture | CRM sync with platforms such as Wealthbox | Time-stamped comments for collaboration and annotation |
| Best-fit workflow | Additional agents for scheduling, onboarding, prospecting, and compliance | Auto-import from local folders, S3, and SMB shares |
Mili
Choose Mili if you need capturing recording-free notes from in-person and virtual client meetings — strengths include recording-free capture appeals to privacy-conscious advisory firms.
OpenTranscribe
Choose OpenTranscribe if you need teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings — strengths include fully self-hosted web app with a complete transcription-and-analysis stack.
Mili
OpenTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Mili is strong for capturing recording-free notes from in-person and virtual client meetings, while OpenTranscribe is strong for teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mili is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.