Metaview and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Metaview: AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Metaview when recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Metaview | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversation | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Automatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call ends | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Customizable note structures aligned to interview templates and scorecards | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Bulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Reporting and analytics across interview conversations | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Candidate search and AI sourcing/screening agents within the wider platform | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Metaview
Choose Metaview if you need recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls — strengths include purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Metaview
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Metaview is strong for recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.