Metaview and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Metaview: AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Metaview when recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback.
AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversationAutomatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call endsBulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversation
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Automatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call ends
AI summaries
Team usage
Customizable note structures aligned to interview templates and scorecards
File upload transcription
Integrations
Bulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Reporting and analytics across interview conversations
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Candidate search and AI sourcing/screening agents within the wider platform
AI summaries
Best for
Metaview
Choose Metaview if you need recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls — strengths include purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Metaview
+ Purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes
+ Reduces time spent writing up interviews and chasing interviewer feedback
- Focused on recruiting interviews, so less suited to general team meetings
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Metaview or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Metaview is strong for recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Metaview and Notta compare on price?
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Metaview and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.