Metaview and Note67 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Metaview: AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Metaview when recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls matters most, and Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback.
AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversationAutomatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call endsBulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversation
Local on-device transcription using Whisper
Standout feature
Automatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call ends
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Team usage
Customizable note structures aligned to interview templates and scorecards
Captures both microphone and system audio
Integrations
Bulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Languages & capture
Reporting and analytics across interview conversations
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Best-fit workflow
Candidate search and AI sourcing/screening agents within the wider platform
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Best for
Metaview
Choose Metaview if you need recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls — strengths include purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes.
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Pros & cons
Metaview
+ Purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes
+ Reduces time spent writing up interviews and chasing interviewer feedback
- Focused on recruiting interviews, so less suited to general team meetings
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
FAQ
Is Metaview or Note67 better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Metaview is strong for recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls, while Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Metaview and Note67 compare on price?
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades and Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Metaview and Note67?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.