Metaview and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Metaview: AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Metaview when recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Metaview | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversation | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Automatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call ends | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Customizable note structures aligned to interview templates and scorecards | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Bulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Reporting and analytics across interview conversations | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | Candidate search and AI sourcing/screening agents within the wider platform | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Metaview
Choose Metaview if you need recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls — strengths include purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Metaview
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Metaview is strong for recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.