Memo AI and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Memo AI: AI transcription and meeting notetaker available as a Chrome extension and web app that records calls, generates transcripts with speaker labels, and produces AI summaries. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Memo AI when transcribing live browser meetings across meet, zoom, teams, and webex matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI transcription and meeting notetaker available as a Chrome extension and web app that records calls, generates transcripts with speaker labels, and produces AI summaries.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes browser-based meetingsSearchable meeting knowledge base with workspace and project organizationSpeaker identification and diarization in transcripts
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
Memo AI vs Typist: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formatsExport to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXTMultiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Memo AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes browser-based meetings
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
Speaker identification and diarization in transcripts
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
Structured notes, AI summaries, and action item extraction
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Support for Google Meet, Zoom web, Microsoft Teams, Webex, and any audio tab
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Web app for uploading and transcribing audio and video files
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Timestamped, clickable transcripts and exports to PDF, Word, and text
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
Memo AI
Choose Memo AI if you need transcribing live browser meetings across meet, zoom, teams, and webex — strengths include covers both live browser capture and uploaded-file transcription.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
Memo AI
+ Covers both live browser capture and uploaded-file transcription
+ Broad platform support including any browser tab with audio
- Splits functionality between a Chrome extension and a separate web app
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is Memo AI or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Memo AI is strong for transcribing live browser meetings across meet, zoom, teams, and webex, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Memo AI and Typist compare on price?
Memo AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Memo AI and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.