Memo AI and Subanana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Memo AI: AI transcription and meeting notetaker available as a Chrome extension and web app that records calls, generates transcripts with speaker labels, and produces AI summaries. Subanana: Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Memo AI when transcribing live browser meetings across meet, zoom, teams, and webex matters most, and Subanana when transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI transcription and meeting notetaker available as a Chrome extension and web app that records calls, generates transcripts with speaker labels, and produces AI summaries.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes browser-based meetingsSearchable meeting knowledge base with workspace and project organizationSpeaker identification and diarization in transcripts
Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support.
AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languagesAutomatic speaker identificationMeeting transcription with automated summaries and action items
Memo AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes browser-based meetings
AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languages
Standout feature
Speaker identification and diarization in transcripts
Strong handling of mixed Cantonese-and-English (code-switching) audio
Team usage
Structured notes, AI summaries, and action item extraction
Meeting transcription with automated summaries and action items
Integrations
Support for Google Meet, Zoom web, Microsoft Teams, Webex, and any audio tab
Real-time voice transcription with live translation
Languages & capture
Web app for uploading and transcribing audio and video files
Automatic speaker identification
Best-fit workflow
Timestamped, clickable transcripts and exports to PDF, Word, and text
Subtitle embedding and export to .srt, .docx, .csv, and .txt
Best for
Memo AI
Choose Memo AI if you need transcribing live browser meetings across meet, zoom, teams, and webex — strengths include covers both live browser capture and uploaded-file transcription.
Subanana
Choose Subanana if you need transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams — strengths include built for the hong kong market with strong cantonese and code-switching support.
Pros & cons
Memo AI
+ Covers both live browser capture and uploaded-file transcription
+ Broad platform support including any browser tab with audio
- Splits functionality between a Chrome extension and a separate web app
Subanana
+ Built for the Hong Kong market with strong Cantonese and code-switching support
+ Covers both subtitling/content workflows and meeting transcription
- Free allowance is limited before requiring a paid plan
FAQ
Is Memo AI or Subanana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Memo AI is strong for transcribing live browser meetings across meet, zoom, teams, and webex, while Subanana is strong for transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Memo AI and Subanana compare on price?
Memo AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Memo AI and Subanana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.