Mem and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mem: AI second-brain notes app that organizes captured information automatically and can record, transcribe, and summarize meetings. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mem when capturing and summarizing meetings alongside everyday notes matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI second-brain notes app that organizes captured information automatically and can record, transcribe, and summarize meetings.
Automatic AI organization of captured notes into collectionsChat across your note history with cited answers from your own notesChrome extension for web clipping and mobile quick capture
Mem is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic AI organization of captured notes into collections
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings with audio and transcript attached
AI summaries
Team usage
Chat across your note history with cited answers from your own notes
File upload transcription
Integrations
Voice brain dumps turned into organized notes
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Chrome extension for web clipping and mobile quick capture
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Heads Up feature that surfaces related notes and context
AI summaries
Best for
Mem
Choose Mem if you need capturing and summarizing meetings alongside everyday notes — strengths include removes the need to manually organize notes with folders and tags.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Mem
+ Removes the need to manually organize notes with folders and tags
+ Chat retrieval cites specific source notes for traceability
- Meeting transcription is one capability within a broader notes app rather than a dedicated meeting tool
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Mem or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mem is strong for capturing and summarizing meetings alongside everyday notes, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mem and Notta compare on price?
Mem is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mem and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.