meetXcc and ownscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. meetXcc: Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items. ownscribe: Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist meetXcc when google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant matters most, and ownscribe when developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items.
Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes.
meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | meetXcc | ownscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free, invisible capture inside Google Meet | Local-first recording, transcription, and summarization via CLI |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription across many languages | System audio capture on macOS 14.2+ through Core Audio |
| Team usage | AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline | WhisperX transcription with word-level timestamps |
| Integrations | Mind map generation from meeting content | Optional speaker diarization via PyAnnote |
| Languages & capture | Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking | Local summarization with a built-in Phi-4-mini model, plus Ollama and OpenAI-compatible backends |
| Best-fit workflow | One-click export, email, and cloud storage sync | Natural-language search across meeting notes with the ask command |
meetXcc
Choose meetXcc if you need google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant — strengths include invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call.
ownscribe
Choose ownscribe if you need developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac — strengths include runs entirely on-device with no data sent to external servers.
meetXcc
ownscribe
It depends on your workflow. meetXcc is strong for google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant, while ownscribe is strong for developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades and ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.