Meetingnotes and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meetingnotes: Free, open-source macOS AI notetaker that records mic and system audio locally, transcribes, and summarizes meetings using your own OpenAI API key. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meetingnotes when engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Free, open-source macOS AI notetaker that records mic and system audio locally, transcribes, and summarizes meetings using your own OpenAI API key.
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meetingnotes | Typist |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Captures both microphone and system audio on macOS | Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats |
| Standout feature | No meeting bot required to join calls | Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT |
| Team usage | Live transcription plus AI-generated summaries | Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy |
| Integrations | Bring-your-own OpenAI API key cost model | Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier |
| Languages & capture | Local storage of meeting data | Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing |
| Best-fit workflow | Open-source codebase on GitHub (LGPL-3.0) | Support for a wide range of languages and accents |
Meetingnotes
Choose Meetingnotes if you need engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker — strengths include free and open source with a transparent codebase.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Meetingnotes
Typist
It depends on your workflow. Meetingnotes is strong for engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.