Meetingnotes and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meetingnotes: Free, open-source macOS AI notetaker that records mic and system audio locally, transcribes, and summarizes meetings using your own OpenAI API key. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meetingnotes when engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Free, open-source macOS AI notetaker that records mic and system audio locally, transcribes, and summarizes meetings using your own OpenAI API key.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meetingnotes | Terret |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Captures both microphone and system audio on macOS | Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale |
| Standout feature | No meeting bot required to join calls | Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring |
| Team usage | Live transcription plus AI-generated summaries | Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation |
| Integrations | Bring-your-own OpenAI API key cost model | AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior |
| Languages & capture | Local storage of meeting data | Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack |
| Best-fit workflow | Open-source codebase on GitHub (LGPL-3.0) | Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing |
Meetingnotes
Choose Meetingnotes if you need engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker — strengths include free and open source with a transparent codebase.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Meetingnotes
Terret
It depends on your workflow. Meetingnotes is strong for engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.