Meetingnotes and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meetingnotes: Free, open-source macOS AI notetaker that records mic and system audio locally, transcribes, and summarizes meetings using your own OpenAI API key. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meetingnotes when engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Free, open-source macOS AI notetaker that records mic and system audio locally, transcribes, and summarizes meetings using your own OpenAI API key.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meetingnotes | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Captures both microphone and system audio on macOS | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | No meeting bot required to join calls | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Live transcription plus AI-generated summaries | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Bring-your-own OpenAI API key cost model | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Local storage of meeting data | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Open-source codebase on GitHub (LGPL-3.0) | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Meetingnotes
Choose Meetingnotes if you need engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker — strengths include free and open source with a transparent codebase.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Meetingnotes
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Meetingnotes is strong for engineers wanting a free, transparent meeting notetaker, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.