Meetingnotes and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meetingnotes: Free, open-source macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings locally using your own OpenAI API key. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meetingnotes when privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Free, open-source macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings locally using your own OpenAI API key.
AI summaries that combine transcripts with manual notesCustomizable system prompts for personalized note-takingLocal storage of notes and transcripts for privacy
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formatsExport to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXTMultiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records both microphone and system audio for meeting capture
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
Real-time transcription using the OpenAI API
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
AI summaries that combine transcripts with manual notes
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Customizable system prompts for personalized note-taking
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Local storage of notes and transcripts for privacy
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Search, copy, and delete management for stored notes
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
Meetingnotes
Choose Meetingnotes if you need privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings — strengths include completely free and open-source with no subscription.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
Meetingnotes
+ Completely free and open-source with no subscription
+ Local-first storage keeps meeting data on the user's device
- macOS only, with no Windows or mobile version
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is Meetingnotes or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Meetingnotes is strong for privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Meetingnotes and Typist compare on price?
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Meetingnotes and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.