Meetingnotes and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meetingnotes: Free, open-source macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings locally using your own OpenAI API key. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meetingnotes when privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Free, open-source macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings locally using your own OpenAI API key.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meetingnotes | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records both microphone and system audio for meeting capture | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription using the OpenAI API | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | AI summaries that combine transcripts with manual notes | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Customizable system prompts for personalized note-taking | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Local storage of notes and transcripts for privacy | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Search, copy, and delete management for stored notes | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Meetingnotes
Choose Meetingnotes if you need privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings — strengths include completely free and open-source with no subscription.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Meetingnotes
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Meetingnotes is strong for privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.