Meetingnotes and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meetingnotes: Free, open-source macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings locally using your own OpenAI API key. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meetingnotes when privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Free, open-source macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings locally using your own OpenAI API key.
AI summaries that combine transcripts with manual notesCustomizable system prompts for personalized note-takingLocal storage of notes and transcripts for privacy
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records both microphone and system audio for meeting capture
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Real-time transcription using the OpenAI API
AI summaries
Team usage
AI summaries that combine transcripts with manual notes
File upload transcription
Integrations
Customizable system prompts for personalized note-taking
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Local storage of notes and transcripts for privacy
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Search, copy, and delete management for stored notes
AI summaries
Best for
Meetingnotes
Choose Meetingnotes if you need privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings — strengths include completely free and open-source with no subscription.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Meetingnotes
+ Completely free and open-source with no subscription
+ Local-first storage keeps meeting data on the user's device
- macOS only, with no Windows or mobile version
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Meetingnotes or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Meetingnotes is strong for privacy-focused engineers recording and summarizing local meetings, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Meetingnotes and Notta compare on price?
Meetingnotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Meetingnotes and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.