MeetingNotes and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingNotes: Chrome extension that joins browser-based Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls to provide real-time transcription and a structured AI summary afterward. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingNotes when solo professionals who want automatic notes across meet, zoom, and teams matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Chrome extension that joins browser-based Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls to provide real-time transcription and a structured AI summary afterward.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
MeetingNotes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | MeetingNotes | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Chrome extension for Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription during the meeting | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Structured AI summary generated automatically after the meeting | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Highlights of key insights, decisions, and action items | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | AI chat to search and ask questions across captured meetings | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Installed and run directly from the Chrome Web Store | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
MeetingNotes
Choose MeetingNotes if you need solo professionals who want automatic notes across meet, zoom, and teams — strengths include lightweight, browser-based setup with no separate desktop app.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
MeetingNotes
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. MeetingNotes is strong for solo professionals who want automatic notes across meet, zoom, and teams, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
MeetingNotes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.