MeetingJuice and Thoth are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingJuice: AI notetaker built for Google Meet, distributed as a Chrome extension and Google Workspace Marketplace add-on, that transcribes calls and generates summaries and action items. Thoth: Privacy-first macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no cloud or data leaving the Mac. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingJuice when teams that run most meetings in google meet and want notes exported into google docs and gmail matters most, and Thoth when professionals handling confidential or regulated information matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI notetaker built for Google Meet, distributed as a Chrome extension and Google Workspace Marketplace add-on, that transcribes calls and generates summaries and action items.
AI-generated summaries in multiple formats (overview, detailed minutes)Automatic action item and decision extractionAvailable as both a Chrome extension and a Google Workspace Marketplace add-on
Privacy-first macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no cloud or data leaving the Mac.
100% local, on-device recording, transcription, and summarizationDual-channel capture of microphone and system audioExport to PDF, Word, Markdown, and timestamped JSON
MeetingJuice is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Thoth is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time transcription with per-speaker attribution for Google Meet
100% local, on-device recording, transcription, and summarization
Standout feature
AI-generated summaries in multiple formats (overview, detailed minutes)
Dual-channel capture of microphone and system audio
Team usage
Automatic action item and decision extraction
On-device speaker detection with color-coded transcripts
Integrations
One-click export to Google Docs, Gmail drafts, and Slack
Whisper-based transcription supporting many languages
Languages & capture
Available as both a Chrome extension and a Google Workspace Marketplace add-on
On-device anonymization to redact sensitive content
Best-fit workflow
Custom summary templates and full-text search across transcripts
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and timestamped JSON
Best for
MeetingJuice
Choose MeetingJuice if you need teams that run most meetings in google meet and want notes exported into google docs and gmail — strengths include deep, native integration with google meet and google workspace apps.
Thoth
Choose Thoth if you need professionals handling confidential or regulated information — strengths include fully local processing with no cloud requirement and no user database.
Pros & cons
MeetingJuice
+ Deep, native integration with Google Meet and Google Workspace apps
+ Flexible capture: live via extension or bot via Workspace add-on
- Focused primarily on Google Meet rather than broad cross-platform support
Thoth
+ Fully local processing with no cloud requirement and no user database
+ Captures both sides of online meetings and works offline
- Requires a Mac with Apple Silicon and sufficient unified memory
FAQ
Is MeetingJuice or Thoth better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. MeetingJuice is strong for teams that run most meetings in google meet and want notes exported into google docs and gmail, while Thoth is strong for professionals handling confidential or regulated information. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do MeetingJuice and Thoth compare on price?
MeetingJuice is a free tier with paid upgrades and Thoth is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both MeetingJuice and Thoth?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.