MeetingBot and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | MeetingBot | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
MeetingBot
Wave
It depends on your workflow. MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.