MeetingBot and Transkriptor are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. Transkriptor: AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most, and Transkriptor when transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | MeetingBot | Transkriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio/video files and links |
| Standout feature | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata | Direct meeting capture and transcription for Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams |
| Team usage | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing | Speaker diarization that labels individual speakers |
| Integrations | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS | Support for transcription in 100+ languages plus translation |
| Languages & capture | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment | AI assistant and AI chat to summarize transcripts and answer questions |
| Best-fit workflow | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM | SRT subtitle export and in-browser transcript editing |
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Transkriptor
Choose Transkriptor if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations — strengths include handles many input methods (file upload, link, recording, and live meetings).
MeetingBot
Transkriptor
It depends on your workflow. MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom, while Transkriptor is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades and Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.