MeetingBot and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | MeetingBot | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant |
| Standout feature | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata | On-device (local) transcription on macOS |
| Team usage | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing | Speaker identification during transcription |
| Integrations | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio |
| Languages & capture | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails |
| Best-fit workflow | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools |
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
MeetingBot
Shadow
It depends on your workflow. MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.