MeetingBot and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | MeetingBot | Scriberr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine |
| Standout feature | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) |
| Team usage | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers |
| Integrations | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights |
| Languages & capture | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts |
| Best-fit workflow | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows |
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
MeetingBot
Scriberr
It depends on your workflow. MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.