MeetingBot and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | MeetingBot | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
MeetingBot
Mina
It depends on your workflow. MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.