Meeting Transcriber and YOMEL are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. YOMEL: Japanese AI meeting-minutes tool that records, transcribes, and auto-summarizes online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and YOMEL when japanese companies automating internal meeting minutes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Japanese AI meeting-minutes tool that records, transcribes, and auto-summarizes online and in-person meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); YOMEL is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | YOMEL |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | One-click recording via desktop and smartphone apps |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Japanese-optimized speech-to-text transcription |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Automatic speaker identification |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | AI summarization with custom summary formats per meeting type |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Works with Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and Webex plus in-person meetings |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Registered dictionary, search and bulk replace, and URL-based external sharing |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
YOMEL
Choose YOMEL if you need japanese companies automating internal meeting minutes — strengths include speech recognition specifically tuned for japanese, including noisy or unclear audio.
Meeting Transcriber
YOMEL
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while YOMEL is strong for japanese companies automating internal meeting minutes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and YOMEL is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.