Meeting Transcriber and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Trellus |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Real-time, in-call AI coaching and adaptive guidance |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Parallel dialer with multiple simultaneous lines |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Automated voicemail drops and number-health monitoring |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualification |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Call analytics and performance scoring |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Meeting Transcriber
Trellus
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.