Meeting Transcriber and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar appDual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separationManual recording of any application plus import of WAV, MP3, M4A, and MP4 files
Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools.
AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualificationAutomated voicemail drops and number-health monitoringCall analytics and performance scoring
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only
Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot
Best for
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Pros & cons
Meeting Transcriber
+ Fully open source under the MIT license with development in the open on GitHub
+ Runs entirely on-device, so audio, transcripts, and summaries can stay local for privacy
- macOS-only and requires macOS 14.2 or later (no Windows or Linux support)
Trellus
+ Adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools
+ Lightweight browser-extension deployment
- Focused on outbound calling rather than full meeting capture
FAQ
Is Meeting Transcriber or Trellus better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Meeting Transcriber and Trellus compare on price?
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Meeting Transcriber and Trellus?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.