Meeting Transcriber and Транскрибатор are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Транскрибатор: Russian-language AI bot that transcribes audio and video and produces meeting summaries and protocols. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Транскрибатор when transcribing russian meetings sent through telegram or max matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Russian-language AI bot that transcribes audio and video and produces meeting summaries and protocols.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Транскрибатор is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Транскрибатор |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Telegram and Max bot delivery |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | PDF meeting-analysis reports |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Russian-language speech recognition |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Audio and video transcription across many formats |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Meeting summaries with topics, decisions and action items |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Structured meeting protocols with assigned tasks |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Транскрибатор
Choose Транскрибатор if you need transcribing russian meetings sent through telegram or max — strengths include focused on russian-language transcription and meeting notes.
Meeting Transcriber
Транскрибатор
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Транскрибатор is strong for transcribing russian meetings sent through telegram or max. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Транскрибатор is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.