Meeting Transcriber and TeamsMaestro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. TeamsMaestro: A Microsoft Teams-focused AI note taker whose bot joins calls to transcribe, summarize, and extract action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and TeamsMaestro when organizations standardized on microsoft teams needing automatic notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
A Microsoft Teams-focused AI note taker whose bot joins calls to transcribe, summarize, and extract action items.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamsMaestro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | TeamsMaestro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Purpose-built for Microsoft Teams meetings |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Bot auto-joins scheduled calls or can be invited manually |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Automatic meeting summaries with key discussion points |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Automatic action-item identification |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Support for 20+ languages with spoken-language detection |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Notes stored in the Teams workspace and shared by email |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
TeamsMaestro
Choose TeamsMaestro if you need organizations standardized on microsoft teams needing automatic notes — strengths include deep, native-feeling focus on microsoft teams workflows.
Meeting Transcriber
TeamsMaestro
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while TeamsMaestro is strong for organizations standardized on microsoft teams needing automatic notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamsMaestro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.