Meeting Transcriber and StreamAlive are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. StreamAlive: Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and StreamAlive when running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | StreamAlive |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Chat-based audience participation across Zoom, Teams, Meet, and YouTube Live |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | AI-powered automatic detection and curation of audience questions |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | AI generation of ready-to-use polls and interactions from a presentation or topic |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | AI chat summaries with insights and notable quotes |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Live polls, word clouds, interactive maps, spinner wheels, and emoji reactions |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Post-session analytics and reports |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
StreamAlive
Choose StreamAlive if you need running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings — strengths include designed specifically for engaging large town hall and all-hands audiences.
Meeting Transcriber
StreamAlive
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while StreamAlive is strong for running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.