Meeting Transcriber and SRTGen are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. SRTGen: AI subtitle and SRT generator that also transcribes meetings, interviews, and podcasts with multi-format caption export. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and SRTGen when generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar appDual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separationManual recording of any application plus import of WAV, MP3, M4A, and MP4 files
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Timeline-based subtitle editor with animation and burn-in options
Best-fit workflow
Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only
Real-time multi-user collaborative editing
Best for
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
SRTGen
Choose SRTGen if you need generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content — strengths include strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows.
Pros & cons
Meeting Transcriber
+ Fully open source under the MIT license with development in the open on GitHub
+ Runs entirely on-device, so audio, transcripts, and summaries can stay local for privacy
- macOS-only and requires macOS 14.2 or later (no Windows or Linux support)
SRTGen
+ Strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows
+ Covers meetings and interviews in addition to social video subtitles
- Primarily oriented toward subtitle files rather than live meeting note-taking
FAQ
Is Meeting Transcriber or SRTGen better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while SRTGen is strong for generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Meeting Transcriber and SRTGen compare on price?
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Meeting Transcriber and SRTGen?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.