Meeting Transcriber and SpeechMind are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. SpeechMind: German AI meeting-protocol software that turns recordings into structured minutes, built for municipalities, public administration and governance bodies. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and SpeechMind when generating formal minutes for council, committee and governance meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
German AI meeting-protocol software that turns recordings into structured minutes, built for municipalities, public administration and governance bodies.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SpeechMind is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | SpeechMind |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Automatic conversion of recordings into structured minutes (results, progress and verbatim protocols) |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Tasks and resolutions captured and clearly structured in each protocol |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Automatic speaker identification and recognition of administrative terminology |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Mobile app (iOS/Android) for on-site recording |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Integrations with Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Webex and Google Meet |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Word document export |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
SpeechMind
Choose SpeechMind if you need generating formal minutes for council, committee and governance meetings — strengths include purpose-built for german public administration and formal governance minutes.
Meeting Transcriber
SpeechMind
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while SpeechMind is strong for generating formal minutes for council, committee and governance meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and SpeechMind is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.