Meeting Transcriber and Speechmatics are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Speechmatics: Speech-to-text and voice AI provider offering real-time transcription and live captioning APIs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Speechmatics when adding live captions to broadcasts, sports, and events matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Speech-to-text and voice AI provider offering real-time transcription and live captioning APIs.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speechmatics is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Speechmatics |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Speech-to-text transcription for recorded and real-time audio |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Low-latency real-time processing for live use |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Live captioning for events, broadcasts, and streams |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Multi-speaker and multilingual support across many languages |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | APIs for embedding transcription into other applications |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Speech-to-text transcription for recorded and real-time audio |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Speechmatics
Choose Speechmatics if you need adding live captions to broadcasts, sports, and events — strengths include real-time, low-latency transcription suitable for live captioning.
Meeting Transcriber
Speechmatics
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Speechmatics is strong for adding live captions to broadcasts, sports, and events. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speechmatics is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.