Meeting Transcriber and Siro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Siro: AI coaching platform for in-person and field sales that records, transcribes, and analyzes face-to-face conversations via a mobile app. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Siro when recording and analyzing in-home and field sales appointments matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
AI coaching platform for in-person and field sales that records, transcribes, and analyzes face-to-face conversations via a mobile app.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Siro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Siro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Mobile recording and transcription of in-person sales conversations |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Real-time mid-conversation coaching (Halftime) |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Ask Siro natural-language search across recorded field conversations |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Self-coaching with examples drawn from top-performing reps |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Automated follow-up drafting and CRM sync |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Performance analytics and coaching insights for managers |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Siro
Choose Siro if you need recording and analyzing in-home and field sales appointments — strengths include purpose-built for in-person and field sales that video tools miss.
Meeting Transcriber
Siro
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Siro is strong for recording and analyzing in-home and field sales appointments. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Siro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.