Meeting Transcriber and Sally are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Sally: German AI meeting assistant that joins calls to record, transcribe, and summarize meetings while extracting tasks and decisions. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Sally when german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
German AI meeting assistant that joins calls to record, transcribe, and summarize meetings while extracting tasks and decisions.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sally is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Sally |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Joins Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and Webex meetings to record and transcribe |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Strong German-language transcription including dialect handling, plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Automatic summaries with action item and decision extraction and assignment |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Meeting analytics such as speaker talk time |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Integrations with CRM and collaboration tools (HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Asana) |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Offline/uploaded audio file transcription for in-person meetings |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Sally
Choose Sally if you need german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items — strengths include optimized for german language and dialects, useful for german-speaking organizations.
Meeting Transcriber
Sally
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Sally is strong for german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sally is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.