Meeting Transcriber and Runo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Runo: India-based SIM-based call management CRM with an AI call summary feature that transcribes sales calls and generates summaries, action items, sentiment, and CRM updates. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Runo when summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
India-based SIM-based call management CRM with an AI call summary feature that transcribes sales calls and generates summaries, action items, sentiment, and CRM updates.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Runo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Runo |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | AI call summaries capturing key points, customer intent, objections, and outcomes |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Call transcription that converts conversations into searchable text |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Sentiment scoring and call disposition tagging |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Automatic CRM sync of summaries and dispositions |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | SIM-based call management from real phone numbers |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Mobile apps (iOS and Android) plus a web dashboard |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Runo
Choose Runo if you need summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams — strengths include purpose-built for india's mobile-first, sim-based calling sales teams.
Meeting Transcriber
Runo
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Runo is strong for summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Runo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.