Meeting Transcriber and Reduct are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Reduct: Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Reduct when capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Reduct |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Transcription of large volumes of audio and video into searchable text |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Live Capture that joins and records Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Text-based video editing by selecting and cutting transcript text |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Annotation, highlighting, and clip-sharing tools for collaboration |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Redaction tools for removing sensitive content from recordings |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Translation of transcripts |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Reduct
Choose Reduct if you need capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews — strengths include makes long recordings navigable by searching and editing transcript text.
Meeting Transcriber
Reduct
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Reduct is strong for capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.