Meeting Transcriber and Noota are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Noota: AI meeting and interview notetaker that records, transcribes, and summarizes calls and structures notes for hiring and sales. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Noota when interview and hiring notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
Recruiter-focused notetaker with structured interview notes/ATS sync
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Noota is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Noota |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | Recording and transcription |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Templates for interviews and sales |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | CRM and ATS integrations |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Recording and transcription |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Noota
Choose Noota if you need interview and hiring notes — strengths include strong templated notes for hiring and sales.
Meeting Transcriber
Noota
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Noota is strong for interview and hiring notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Noota is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.