Meeting Transcriber and Metaview are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Transcriber: Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device. Metaview: AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Transcriber when privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac matters most, and Metaview when recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first macOS app that auto-records Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and transcribes, diarizes, and summarizes them entirely on-device.
AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Transcriber | Metaview |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic recording of Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings via a macOS menu bar app | AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversation |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with selectable engines: WhisperKit, Parakeet TDT v3, or Qwen3-ASR | Automatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call ends |
| Team usage | Dual-track diarization with separate app and microphone tracks for clean speaker separation | Customizable note structures aligned to interview templates and scorecards |
| Integrations | Recurring-speaker recognition using stored voice embeddings matched by cosine similarity | Bulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms |
| Languages & capture | Structured Markdown protocols (summary, participants, topics, decisions, tasks, open questions, transcript) | Reporting and analytics across interview conversations |
| Best-fit workflow | Pluggable summarization backends: Claude Code CLI, OpenAI-compatible APIs (Ollama, LM Studio), or transcript-only | Candidate search and AI sourcing/screening agents within the wider platform |
Meeting Transcriber
Choose Meeting Transcriber if you need privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac — strengths include fully open source under the mit license with development in the open on github.
Metaview
Choose Metaview if you need recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls — strengths include purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes.
Meeting Transcriber
Metaview
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Transcriber is strong for privacy-conscious professionals who want meeting transcripts and notes kept on their own mac, while Metaview is strong for recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Transcriber is a free tier with paid upgrades and Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.