Meeting Metrics and Yating are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Metrics: Swiss AI meeting intelligence platform with transcription, summaries and analytics, processed and stored on Swiss servers. Yating: Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Metrics when transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings matters most, and Yating when students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Swiss AI meeting intelligence platform with transcription, summaries and analytics, processed and stored on Swiss servers.
Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching.
Meeting Metrics is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Metrics | Yating |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription, summaries and meeting analytics | Live microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files |
| Standout feature | Speaker recognition with customizable summary templates | Optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching |
| Team usage | Interactive chat to search and query meeting content | Support for Mandarin, Taiwanese, English, Japanese, and Cantonese |
| Integrations | Strong German and Swiss German language support across many languages | Speaker identification with timestamps |
| Languages & capture | Processing and storage on Swiss servers, with local-AI enterprise options | Subtitle mode for accessibility |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic transcription, summaries and meeting analytics | Cross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome plugin |
Meeting Metrics
Choose Meeting Metrics if you need transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings — strengths include swiss data sovereignty with processing and storage in switzerland.
Yating
Choose Yating if you need students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english — strengths include strong handling of taiwanese-accent mandarin and chinese-english code-switching.
Meeting Metrics
Yating
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Metrics is strong for transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings, while Yating is strong for students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Metrics is a free tier with paid upgrades and Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.