Meeting Metrics and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Metrics: Swiss AI meeting intelligence platform with transcription, summaries and analytics, processed and stored on Swiss servers. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Metrics when transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Swiss AI meeting intelligence platform with transcription, summaries and analytics, processed and stored on Swiss servers.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Meeting Metrics is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Metrics | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription, summaries and meeting analytics | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Speaker recognition with customizable summary templates | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Interactive chat to search and query meeting content | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Strong German and Swiss German language support across many languages | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Processing and storage on Swiss servers, with local-AI enterprise options | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic transcription, summaries and meeting analytics | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Meeting Metrics
Choose Meeting Metrics if you need transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings — strengths include swiss data sovereignty with processing and storage in switzerland.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Meeting Metrics
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Metrics is strong for transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Metrics is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.