Meeting Ink and Zeck are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. Zeck: Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and Zeck when preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | Zeck |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | AI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussions |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notes |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | AI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | Smart agendas and interactive, mobile-first board updates |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | Pre-vote and digital voting with a centralized automated minutes book |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | Real-time commenting across board materials |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Zeck
Choose Zeck if you need preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting — strengths include purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes.
Meeting Ink
Zeck
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while Zeck is strong for preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.