Meeting Ink and VoicePen are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. VoicePen: Apple-native AI app that records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and voice memos, then turns them into summaries and rewritten notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and VoicePen when capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Apple-native AI app that records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and voice memos, then turns them into summaries and rewritten notes.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); VoicePen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | VoicePen |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Records and transcribes meetings, lectures, memos, and imported audio/video |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | AI-generated summaries plus 25+ rewrite and reformatting options |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | Speaker separation and labeling within transcripts |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | Chat-with-your-notes Q&A to extract takeaways and action steps |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | Imports from Voice Memos, Zoom recordings, podcasts, YouTube, and files |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | Multilingual transcription with offline recording and iCloud sync |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
VoicePen
Choose VoicePen if you need capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations — strengths include native across iphone, ipad, apple watch, and mac with icloud sync.
Meeting Ink
VoicePen
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while VoicePen is strong for capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and VoicePen is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.