Meeting Ink and Userology are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. Userology: Vision-aware AI UX research agent that moderates usability and concept-testing interviews and reports task metrics and insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and Userology when ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Vision-aware AI UX research agent that moderates usability and concept-testing interviews and reports task metrics and insights.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Userology is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | Userology |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Vision-aware AI moderator that observes on-screen task completion |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | Context-aware follow-ups with silence detection and glitch handling |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | Multiple methods: voice interviews, prototype testing, live product research, diary studies |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | Automated reports with transcripts, insights, and task-based metrics |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | Chat-with-your-research data exploration |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | Built-in panel recruitment plus User Interviews integration, 40+ languages |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Userology
Choose Userology if you need ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products — strengths include vision awareness supports usability and prototype testing, not just verbal interviews.
Meeting Ink
Userology
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while Userology is strong for ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and Userology is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.