Meeting Ink and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Meeting Ink
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.