Meeting Ink and Sonix are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. Sonix: Automated transcription service that converts audio and video into searchable text in many languages, with editing tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and Sonix when transcribing recorded meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Automated transcription service that converts audio and video into searchable text in many languages, with editing tools.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | Sonix |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Automated transcription |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | In-browser transcript editor |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | Multi-language support |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | Translation and subtitles |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | Search across transcripts |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | Automated transcription |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Sonix
Choose Sonix if you need transcribing recorded meetings — strengths include accurate transcription with strong editing.
Meeting Ink
Sonix
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while Sonix is strong for transcribing recorded meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.