Meeting Ink and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | Notta |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | 58-language transcription |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | AI summaries |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | File upload transcription |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | CRM integrations |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | 58-language transcription |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | AI summaries |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Meeting Ink
Notta
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.