Meeting Ink and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Meeting Ink when taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Meeting Ink | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Meeting Ink
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.